On Implication of appointment at pleasure of Governor

Any person who accepts appointment at the pleasure of a Governor can also be removed at the pleasure of the Governor. He serves at his pleasure for as long as he is pleased. In the instant case, the appellants were rightly removed by the Governor. The appointments were at the pleasure of the Governor and there was no record that their appointments were confirmed by a resolution of the House of Assembly of the State as required by section 198 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended). Their removal could not be subjected to the provision of section 201 of the Constitution.

MAJOR GENERAL KAYODE ONI (Rtd.) & 3Ors v GOVERNOR OF EKITI STATE & 1 Or – SC. 622/2015 decided on 18th January 2019

Related posts

The Nigeria Police Force Cannot Shirk Their Responsibility to Provide Security in Rivers State

Afam Okeke, the Immediate Past Chairman of the Unity Bar Congratulates Prof Azinge on his Coronation

Breaking: The New Supreme Court Rules 2024 now Available!